<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Netbooks, Tablets, Phones, Android, iOS, Small Form Factor Computers &#124; smallcomputing.net &#187; via</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smallcomputing.net/tag/via/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smallcomputing.net</link>
	<description>Netbooks, Small Form Factor Computers, Tablets, Phones, Android, iOS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:39:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SFF and Performance Computing</title>
		<link>http://smallcomputing.net/2009/07/06/sff-and-performance-computing/</link>
		<comments>http://smallcomputing.net/2009/07/06/sff-and-performance-computing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 04:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[via]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smallcomputing.net/?p=683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SFF is something that has been around for ages, but because of technological limitations, it has historically been limited to low-power operations, both in the sense of low wattage and low processing ability. With the advent of the Atom, Intel has brought SFF computing the front and almost single-handedly reinforced the stigma that SFF computing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://smallcomputing.net/2009/07/06/sff-and-performance-computing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VIA and nVidia Getting Out of Netbook Business?</title>
		<link>http://smallcomputing.net/2008/11/05/via-and-nvidia-getting-out-of-netbook-business/</link>
		<comments>http://smallcomputing.net/2008/11/05/via-and-nvidia-getting-out-of-netbook-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 15:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[via]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smallcomputing.net/?p=430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not sure how to read this, exactly, because it may be easier to overstate what is actually happening. Remember VIA and how I keep mentioning their Nano? The Nano is their CPU that actually puts up a fight against the Atom, and in many cases, eclipses it. Well, it&#8217;s been taking a long time [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://smallcomputing.net/2008/11/05/via-and-nvidia-getting-out-of-netbook-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP Mini 1000 Netbook</title>
		<link>http://smallcomputing.net/2008/10/31/hp-mini-1000-netbook/</link>
		<comments>http://smallcomputing.net/2008/10/31/hp-mini-1000-netbook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[via]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smallcomputing.net/?p=427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So it was just last week that Dell decided to let the world know that they&#8217;re going to be releasing what looks to be a compelling netbook, the Dell Mini 12 Netbook / Dell Inspiron 1210 Netbook, and this week we have HP re-entering the market with their HP Mini 1000 netbook. What separates this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://smallcomputing.net/2008/10/31/hp-mini-1000-netbook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commodore netbook and more, part 2</title>
		<link>http://smallcomputing.net/2008/09/02/commodore-netbook-and-more-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://smallcomputing.net/2008/09/02/commodore-netbook-and-more-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[via]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smallcomputing.net/?p=301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hot on the heels of the news of the Commodore netbook announcement comes more information, sort of, and a boatload of pictures of that and some other projects Commodore has been working on. Maybe it&#8217;s the old school geek in me, but I look at these things and I want one. In fact, I&#8217;d go [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://smallcomputing.net/2008/09/02/commodore-netbook-and-more-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Everex CloudBook CE1200V Netbook review</title>
		<link>http://smallcomputing.net/2008/08/25/everex-cloudbook-ce1200v-netbook-review/</link>
		<comments>http://smallcomputing.net/2008/08/25/everex-cloudbook-ce1200v-netbook-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 05:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[via]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smallcomputing.net/?p=218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems my idea of doing retro reviews on old, crappy hardware that no one really cares about except to laugh at has already been done. This review of the Everex netbook, which must be somewhere around a year after the netbook was originally released, goes into the gory details of how big a failure [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://smallcomputing.net/2008/08/25/everex-cloudbook-ce1200v-netbook-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News round-up: another tablet; VIA; Qualcomm netbook?</title>
		<link>http://smallcomputing.net/2008/08/19/news-round-up-another-tablet-via-qualcomm-netbook/</link>
		<comments>http://smallcomputing.net/2008/08/19/news-round-up-another-tablet-via-qualcomm-netbook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qualcomm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snapdragon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[via]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smallcomputing.net/?p=143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First on the list is another netbook tablet being powered by the Atom from Arbor (who?). I know I railed on poor Kohjinsha&#8217;s upcoming netbook tablet, but this one is a little more interesting to me because it&#8217;s a 7&#8243; tablet computer, and it&#8217;s been ruggedized. The market may not be the standard consumer market [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://smallcomputing.net/2008/08/19/news-round-up-another-tablet-via-qualcomm-netbook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VIA and Mobile-ITX and Nano orders from HP and&#8230;who?</title>
		<link>http://smallcomputing.net/2008/08/15/via-and-mobile-itx-and-nano-orders-from-hp-andwho/</link>
		<comments>http://smallcomputing.net/2008/08/15/via-and-mobile-itx-and-nano-orders-from-hp-andwho/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[via]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smallcomputing.net/?p=98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DigiTimes is reporting that VIA is prepping to launch Mobile-ITX, which is supposed to be even smaller than Pico-ITX. Read that again: smaller than Pico-ITX. I have to wonder if that&#8217;s a typo considering how ridiculously small Pico-ITX is, especially when you consider that Mobile-ITX is going to support the C7 and Nano. DigiTimes speculates [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://smallcomputing.net/2008/08/15/via-and-mobile-itx-and-nano-orders-from-hp-andwho/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Atom and Nano</title>
		<link>http://smallcomputing.net/2008/08/12/atom-and-nano/</link>
		<comments>http://smallcomputing.net/2008/08/12/atom-and-nano/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[via]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smallcomputing.net/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Atom, obviously, is what is powering a large portion of the netbooks on the market now and those coming out soon. The Nano, however, is where things get interesting.

I aluded to this in the quick blurb about the Avaratec netbook, but one of my biggest gripes with the Atom is that Intel seems to be very insistent upon not offering a better video solution than the underpowered GMA950. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://smallcomputing.net/2008/08/12/atom-and-nano/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

